The Apostles vs. Calvinism

I linked The Apostles vs. John Calvin on Facebook, and a friend rightly suggested that John Calvin is not the right  target. We may or may not agree on the reasons, but he is correct. This post will cover the real target and the reasons for that target.


Calvinism is the target for two reasons. One, most of Reformation theology can be summed up under Calvinism. I found these quotes at The Apostolic Doctrine:

"If, in your investigation, you probe into the history and influence of Calvinism, you will discover that its doctrines have been incorporated into the majority of the great creeds of the Protestant churches" (The Five Points of Calvinism, David N. Steele & Curtis C. Thomas, Presbyterian & Reformed Pub. Co., 1963, p. 61).

"Calvinism has formed the doctrinal basis of the Presbyterian Church, the Reformed Church, the Episcopal Church of America, and in the main the Baptist and Congregationalist Churches, which include the United Church of Christ. Most aspects of Calvinistic ideology are found in the Nazarene Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church, and almost all so called “Evangelical” churches." (See McClintock & Strong, Vol. 2, p. 47.)

I would agree this is true. I would argue that this is a terrible problem, but not for the reasons you might expect. Though I disagree with each tenet of Calvinism's famous five points (TULIP: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, Perseverance of the Saints), I consider most of them much less dangerous than their deeper foundations, a false view of both the Atonement and final judgment. 

In fact, these foundations precede Calvinism and even Calvin and the Reformation. The Reformation doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) was first formulated by St. Anselm in the eleventh century and finalized by Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth. Both were Roman Catholics.1 Nonetheless, since the Calvinist understanding of the final judgment and the Atonement is "incorporated into the majority of the great creeds" and has "formed the doctrinal basis of ... almost all so called 'Evangelical' churches," let's touch on what that understanding is and why I pit the apostles against those doctrines.

Why Target Calvinism

The first reason for targeting Calvinism is the view of the final judgment that has infected almost all Protestant Christianity, but which is thankfully being cured by a healthy dose of the Information Age. Calvinists, along with many who are influenced by Calvinism, believe that God will punish even the smallest sin with eternal torment. Ligonier Ministries, for example, writes:

Of the 47 statements included in The State of Theology study for 2016 ... the responses to one statement stood out. ... The results show slight majorities either getting a belief right or, in most cases, getting a belief wrong. But not statement 17, "Even the smallest sin deserves eternal damnation." ... Glancing at the graph of the data shows this response not to be a simple majority, but rather a whopping majority. 61% strongly disagree. Another 12% disagree somewhat and 7% are not sure. That leaves only 21% agreeing with this statement.2

Personally, I would expect people to be thrilled to find out that people are not accusing God of torturing humans eternally for one small sin. If torturing terrorists during a human lifetime at Guantanamo Bay to prevent further terrorism is potentially immoral, how much more immoral would eternal torture for cheating on a fifth-grade test be!?

Apparently, Ligonier Ministries thinks it is not immoral at all! They write:

Eight out of ten Americans have an incorrect view of sin. As an implication, we could say that eight out of ten Americans do not know the biblical God. (ibid.)

The *biblical* God tortures people for eternity for "THE SMALLEST SIN"??? That would stop me from reading the Bible unless it was to prove the Bible said no such thing!

This is worth targeting. This is worth mounting a war against. Thanks be to God in heaven that a mere 21% of people who took their survey do not believe this slander against God. Thanks be to God that even the group most strongly indfluenced by Calvinism, the evangelicals, reject this slander by a small majority (54%). (ibid.)

The first idea, that God tortures people eternally for the smallest sin, leads to the second: God does not forgive sin without killing a human or animal.


Surely all of us who are in any way spiritually descended from the Reformation will recognize the lyrics of the hymn "Christ Alone" by Allen Asbury:

"Til on that Cross, as Jesus died
The wrath of God was satisfied

 We all believe this, right? We all know that this is obviously true?

Yes. If we are western Christians. If, on the other hand, we are descended from Asian and Middle Eastern churches that have used the Greek language two thousand years, this is a horrifying thought.

Orthodox Archbishop Lazar Puhalo offered this scathing castigation of the concept of Jesus’ atoning sacrifice: “A god who demands the child-sacrifice of his own son to satiate his own wrath? That is not Jehovah. That is Molech.”3

Molech, of course, is one of the Canaanite gods. He demanded that babies be "passed through" the fire in his honor. He is spoken against throughout the Old Testament (e.g., four times in Leviticus 20:1-4).

Obviously, God did sacrifice his Son. That is the central theme of the Bible! It cannot be disputed. So what is this Orthodox archbishop castigating?

The answer is found in the words "to satiate [i.e., satisfy] his own wrath." Let us say someone were to commit a crime that infuriated me, and I was determined to kill the perpetrator. Once I found out it was my wife, whom I loved with all my heart, I knew I could not kill her. So I called my son into the room. I say, "Son, I am so angry that I have to kill someone. The problem is, it was your mom that committed the crime. I don't want to kill her, but I can't just show her mercy because I am holy and just. Would you be willing to let me kill you so that I don't have to kill your mom?"

The son might be the hero of that story, but I would be the villain. It would be useless to tell the court that I could not forgive my wife because I am too holy and just. Well, come to think of it, it might be useful. I might get time in a mental institution rather than a life sentence in prison.

God is not like this. His very nature is to forgive sin. When he revealed himself to Moses, he declared:

The Lord, the Lord God, compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth; who keeps lovingkindness for thousands, who forgives iniquity, transgression and sin; yet He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished, visiting the iniquity of fathers on the children and on the grandchildren to the third and fourth generations. [Ex. 34:6-7, NASB1995; italics in original]

Psalm 136 announces twenty-six times that his lovingkindness is everlasting. Jeremiah's proclamation that the Lord's mercy never ends and is new every morning [Lam. 3:22-23] has been incorporated into many Christian songs and choruses. David cries out in Psalm 51, "Sacrifice and offering you do not desire, or I would have offered it. You do not delight in burnt offerings. The sacrifices of God are a contrite spirit. A broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise" (vv. 16-17)

God can and does forgive sin without killing anyone or anything and always has!

Then why did Jesus die?

Because we were slaves to sin, and he loves us! No one, especially the Lord God Almighty, leaves his children in slavery if he can prevent it.  

God's concern, and the reason for Jesus' death, is that we were slaves to sin. Sin was destroying us. Thus, Jesus died to "redeem us" (Tit. 2:14), "ransom us" (Matt. 20:28), and "free us" (Rom. 6:7) from sin.

I'm going to put this succinctly, and I will have to prove it in other blog posts. From Romans 1:18 through the end of Romans 2, the apostle Paul is arguing that at the final judgment evil people will receive death (esp. 1:32) and righteous people will receive eternal life (esp. 2:6-7). There is no scholarly interpretation needed to conclude this. It is both plainly stated and thoroughly explained.

From Romans 3 through Romans 8, Paul explains how faith in Jesus as the Lord and risen Son of God (Rom. 1:1-5; 10:9-10) can turn a sinner into a righteous man. He is not talking about someone who God pretends is righteous, but someone who actually is righteous. We were slaves to sin, but have become obedient (Rom. 6:17). "Being made free from sin, you became slaves of righteousness (Rom. 6:18).

This is the atonement, and we will be talking about both it and the ways God has equipped us to live righteously throughout these blog posts.


1The word "catholic" means universal. Among the second and third century churches, "catholic" was used to signify the unity of the churches in all the world. The descendants of those churches are no longer united. The churches in the Roman Empire cut off almost all churches east of them along with Syrian and Egyptian churches in the fourth century. In the eleventh century, the churches from Greece to the Middle East and the church in Rome mutually excommunicated each other. Thus, there is no longer a "Catholic Church." I always refer to the Catholic Church headed by the pope as the "Roman" Catholic Church. return to text

2Nichols, S. (2016). The State of Theology: Does Even the Smallest Sin Deserve Eternal Damnation?. Ligonier Ministries. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from Perhaps the most interesting thing about this comment by Ligonier Ministries is that they have since removed this question from their "The State of Theology" web page. return to text

3Erdman, R. 1996. "Sacrifice as Satisfaction, Not Substitution: Atonement in the Summa Theologiae." Anglican Theological Review 96.3. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from return to top 

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to:

Have something to say? Leave a comment below.

Leave a comment   Like   Back to Top   Seen 74 times   Liked 0 times

Subscribe to Updates

If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe to free email updates ?

Subscribe to Blog updates

Enter your email address to be notified of new posts:

Subscribe to:

Alternatively, you can subscribe via RSS RSS

‹ Return to Blog

We never share or sell your email address to anyone.

I've already subscribed / don't show me this again

Recent Posts

Transformation: The Holy Spirit, the Light, the Renewing of Your Mind

| 27th July 2021 | Blogging

I sent this email today and, boy, did it fire me up and exhort me. May it do the same for you:   I really want to answer your question, and I only see one in your email. "How in Jesus' name do I live holy?!"   I have an answer because I, of course, have faced the same battle you describe. Once you find out that the evangelical version of salvation by faith alone--the "free ticket to heaven" doctrine--is bogus, then what replaces it? Works? In fact, yes, works replace faith alone (James 2:24), but it is critically important not to turn works into law. There is no law that can produce righteousness (Gal. 3:21). We will be judged by our works, but we will never obtain works by the hearing of the law, whether it is the Law of Moses or the law of some denomination or the law we put upon ourselves.   To me, the most comforting verse in the Bible is, "For we, through the Spirit, await the righteousness that comes by faith" (Gal. 5:5).   Once we figure out that the evangelical plan of salvation is bogus, our biggest problem is that we still think God our Father is a God of rules, law, and condemnation. Honestly, we still think God is stupid. We think he is shocked by sin and surprised at human weakness. We think he is appalled that our ways are lower than his and our thoughts lower than his. We think he doesn't realize that we are human and weak.   Jesus is going to save us, and both he and his Father know that we need to be saved! He knows that we are drowning in sin. He knows that we have no self-control. This is why he said that we can do nothing without him (Jn. 15:5). We live "by his life" (Gal. 2:20) and "by his Spirit" (dozens of verses, but Rom. 8:13 is a good one).   If you don't have hopelessness in yourself, you will never have the right kind of trust in God, nor power to walk in the Spirit.   So, first, hopelessness in your flesh. You should not be surprised you are failing because God is not surprised. You are not the committed Christian you thought you were because you have a wrong picture of what a committed Christian is. Let's talk about walking in the Spirit and walking in the light.   Walking in the Spirit has everything to do with your mind. After telling us that we will be delivered from the Romans 7 life by the sacrifice of Christ and gift of the Holy Spirit (Rom. 8:1-4), Paul writes, "The mind set on the Spirit is life and peace." That is followed quickly by, in so many words, "the mind set on the flesh is death." There is such a thing as a committed, self-controlled Christian. The committed, self-controlled Christian runs to his (or her) Father quickly, hopeless in his or her own strength, not fighting temptation but fleeing (2 Tim. 2:22) and escaping (1 Cor. 10:13) it. Because the one who walks in the Spirit is the one who sets his mind on the things of the Spirit, the only place he or she knows to flee is to Jesus. We look to Jesus as our example (Heb. 12:1-2), we look to heaven where Jesus, our life, sits at the right hand of the Father. We set our mind on spiritual things. We contemplate how we are seated in the heavenlies with King Jesus at the right hand of the Father (Eph. 2:7, I think).   When we do something other than that, and wind up giving into temptation, we lament and wail and mourn, and we humble ourselves under the mighty hand of God, not because God won't forgive us otherwise, but because that is the place we were always supposed to be anyway, under the MIGHTY hand of God. God is mighty when he judges, but he is even more mighty when he forgives AND delivers. This is the great work of God, that he can transform weak humans into men and women of God. Elijah lusted like we do (James 5:17), but he was a mighty man with God, praying and stopping the rain for 3 years, then praying again and the rain came back. Why? It was not because he was stronger than us; that is what James is saying. Instead,...

See the Promise, Not the Pain

| 20th July 2021 | Blogging

More than 1,800 years ago, a Jew told a Christian, "I am aware that your precepts in the so-called Gospel are so wonderful and so great, that I suspect no one can keep them; for I have carefully read them" (Justin, Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 10). Unfortunately, today, a lot of Christians agree with him. Worse, there are teachers who claim Jesus' teaching do not need to be obeyed because they were given while the Old Testament was still in effect. Jesus' own teachings, these absurd teachers say, are to be rejected as "law" because he had not died yet. Trypho the Jew was referring to Jesus' commands when he mentioned "precepts in the Gospel," but modern Christians often dismiss the commands of the apostles as well, giving themselves license to ignore Jesus and his apostles because "we are under grace." I could refute that idea by pointing out that the only occurrences of "under grace" in the Bible are in Romans 6:14 and 6:15, where Paul tells us that sin will not have power over us because we are "under grace" and that we should not sin because we are "under grace." But let's skip that and get to the heart of the matter. Jesus' commands are not easy. Let's just look at commands that are in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5-7). "Rejoice when you are persecuted." "If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn the other to him." "Do not resist an evil man." "Do not commit adultery, nor even look upon a woman for the purpose of lusting." "Do not bother with oaths; instead, fulfill every word that comes out of your mouth." "Do not give any thought to tomorrow." When you look at the commands, it is easy to see pain. It is easy to see hard work, an impossible transformation of our human nature, a self-control beyond the reach of anyone. That's what Trypho the Jew saw. If you look only at the commands, that is what you will see too. You will see pain. I prefer to look at the promises. He who hears my words and does them is like a man who built his house on the rock. The rains came, the floods came, and the wind blew and beat upon that house, but it did not fall because its foundation was laid on a rock. (Matt. 7:24) The apostle Paul said, "I consider the sufferings of this present time not worthy to be compared to the glory that shall be revealed in us" (Rom. 8:18). Hebrews 12:2 says, "Look at Jesus, the trailblazer and the One who has mastered our faith. For the joy that was before him, he endured the cross, despising the shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God." We don't understand the promise. We don't see the joy ahead like Jesus did, like Paul did. Notice in Hebrews 12:2 that Jesus did not just endure the shame of the cross, he "despised" it. He brushed it away as nothing because he was looking at a joy. He was going to triumph over our captors. He was going to crush them, take away the keys of Hades of death (Rev. 1:18), triumphantly parade them in chains to the world (Col. 2:15), then sit down at God's right hand. He saw the victory from before the cross, so he went through it for you, for me. Paul saw the fruit of Jesus' victory. He saw the glory that shall be revealed in us. He prayed that we would, too: I never stop giving thanks for you, mentioning you in my prayers, that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you the Spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him, the eyes of your understanding being enlightened, so that you may know what is the hope of your calling and the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints. (Eph. 1:16-18) Paul wanted that glory so bad that he wrote: I consider everything loss because of the superiority of the knowledge of Jesus Christ through whom I have suffered the loss of everything, and consider it all dung, so that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having my own righteousness from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness of God which depends on faith, so that I may ...

Jesus Builds His Church on a Rock

| 14th July 2021 | Blogging

I want to create a Bible course on three levels: For committed disciples who are bearing fruit and already understand the Scriptures. For the active Christian who needs to understand God's call to discipleship. For those who need to find out they still need to become Christians. All three courses will develop from Matthew 16:13-20. Reading and understanding this passage requires looking at passages that will carry the student step by step through all of Scripture. Now when Jesus came into the parts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?” They said, “Some say John the Baptizer, some, Elijah, and others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. I also tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my assembly, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give to you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will have been bound in heaven; and whatever you release on earth will have been released in heaven.” Then he commanded the disciples that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ.  The things to notice are: Jesus really liked what Peter said. He thought Peter could not have known he was Christ and Son of God without revelation from the Father. He made some amazing Peter And above all, we must notice that: Jesus is going to build his church on a rock that is mentioned in this passage. Normally, I would go on to questions that will lead the students to consider the passage for themselves, and as they come up with answers, I will give them more Scripture passages related to their answers. In this way, I hope to begin a never-ending path with branches that wind through the whole Bible. In this case, one interpretation is really tough, so I am going to provide it as a freebie. I will ask two unusual questions. Who here knows this is probably the Roman Catholic Church's favorite verse? Who here thinks this is proof positive that you should do whatever Pope Francis says? Next I will use the questions to point out that when most Protestants read this passage, they focus on denying Roman Catholic claims rather than interpreting the passage. We, instead, want to find out what, or who, the rock is. Typically, I will want the students to do their own interpretations, but I think this one's tough. Thus, the first interpretation is on me. Everybody, Roman Catholics and Protestants and Orthodox alike, agrees that the rock on which Jesus will build his church is Peter's confession. In addition, the Roman Catholics believe that Peter is the rock. I think, then, before we go further, we will address Peter as the rock by going to 1 Peter 2:4-9. You should be able to hover over the Scripture and read it without me having to copy it to this page as a quote. I generally ask two questions about every passage: What stands out to you in this passage, or what do you like about it? What is hard to understand in this passage or maybe even bothers you? I will let the students discuss the passage, but I want make sure they see that Jesus is both the only foundation of the church and the chief cornerstone. I will introduce 1 Corinthians 3:11 in the discussion. We are all living stones built on Jesus. Peter, however, is the first of those stones. Thus, Jesus offered him rewards, which we will discuss when we get back to Matthew 16. I will add two more questions to lead us back to Matthew 16. How do we become living stones like Peter? How did Peter know to make his confession? I hope for a solid discussion about confessing Jesus as Christ and Son of God and the difference between this and co...

"Flesh" or "Sinful Nature"? Overcoming the Flesh by the Spirit

| 25th June 2021 | Blogging

Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New American Standard Bible, 1995 edition. Living by the Spirit rather than living by the flesh is a central theme of the New Testament. Much of Galatians 5 is devoted to the subject, and it could be argued that the whole letter is summed up in "Are you so foolish, having begun in the Spirit, are you now completed in the flesh" (Gal. 3:3). In Romans, walking by the Spirit in chapter 8 is the answer to the sin problem in chapter 7 (esp. 8:2-4). More practically, how to overcome the flesh and its desires is the greatest battle most Christians face. Supposedly, our old man was crucified with him, and the "body of sin" is done away with so that we are "freed from sin" (Rom. 6:6-7). Often, though, the old man seems quite healthy, and the "body of sin" gives us fits! I have an answer for you. "Flesh" vs. "Sinful Nature" The New International Version, and perhaps others, uses "sinful nature" rather than "flesh" in several places in the New Testament. Even where it does not actually use "sinful nature,' such as in Galatians 5, the NIV adds a note saying: In contexts like this, the Greek word for flesh (sarx) refers to the sinful state of human beings, often presented as a power in opposition to the Spirit" (Gal. 5:13, footnote). This translation is a problem on two levels. First, in several verses, it makes no sense. For example, in Romans 8:3, we read that God sent his Son in the likeness of "sinful flesh." If we used "sinful nature" there, we would have "in the likeness of sinful sinful nature." At the end of the same verse, we would have "he condemned sin in the sinful nature." Second, if we read through Romans 7, we will see that the problem is not that our flesh is sinful nature. Instead, sin itself "produced in me all kinds of coveting" (v. 8). Sin itself "revived" (v.9). Sin itself "deceived me, and through [the commandment] killed me." Paul's conclusion is that "If what I don't desire, that I do, it is no longer I that do it, but sin which dwells in me." Therefore, when he gives the answer to this problem in Romans 8:3, he says Jesus condemned "sin in the flesh," not the flesh itself. Once we come to Christ, the "body of sin" really is done away with and we really are freed from sin (Rom. 6:6-7). What we are not freed from is our flesh, which is not our sin nature, but literally our flesh, i.e., our body. Before you were a Christian, your bodily desires were empowered by sin which dwelt in you. Romans 7 describes the slavery this produces. We want to do what is good, but we cannot. By the end of the chapter, he cries out, "Who will deliver me from this body of death!" Some Christians believe that the answer to this question is "no one." They believe that Romans 7 is describing Paul's experience as a Christian. That idea would contradict both Romans 6 and Romans 8. Paul's answer to the question is, "Thanks be to God, Jesus is going to deliver me from this body of death" (Rom. 7:25 in my words). He then spends Romans 8 explaining just how Jesus delivered us from this body of death. He delivered us by condemning sin in the flesh and giving us the Holy Spirit. He did not condemn the flesh, which is our body, and which we must have to live in and interact with this world. Our body has desires, some of them very strong desires, but those desires are no longer empowered by the sin which used to dwell in our flesh. We still need to overcome the desires of the flesh. Now, though, the sin that made your body master over you has been condemned. You have been given the Holy Spirit to "put to death the deeds of body" (Rom. 8:13). Jesus broke the power of sin so that would have no mastery over you, gave you the Holy Spirit, and now your job is to put to death the deeds of the body through the Spirit. The situation this creates is: The flesh sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you...