The Apostles vs. Calvinism

I linked The Apostles vs. John Calvin on Facebook, and a friend rightly suggested that John Calvin is not the right  target. We may or may not agree on the reasons, but he is correct. This post will cover the real target and the reasons for that target.


Calvinism is the target for two reasons. One, most of Reformation theology can be summed up under Calvinism. I found these quotes at The Apostolic Doctrine:

"If, in your investigation, you probe into the history and influence of Calvinism, you will discover that its doctrines have been incorporated into the majority of the great creeds of the Protestant churches" (The Five Points of Calvinism, David N. Steele & Curtis C. Thomas, Presbyterian & Reformed Pub. Co., 1963, p. 61).

"Calvinism has formed the doctrinal basis of the Presbyterian Church, the Reformed Church, the Episcopal Church of America, and in the main the Baptist and Congregationalist Churches, which include the United Church of Christ. Most aspects of Calvinistic ideology are found in the Nazarene Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church, and almost all so called “Evangelical” churches." (See McClintock & Strong, Vol. 2, p. 47.)

I would agree this is true. I would argue that this is a terrible problem, but not for the reasons you might expect. Though I disagree with each tenet of Calvinism's famous five points (TULIP: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, Perseverance of the Saints), I consider most of them much less dangerous than their deeper foundations, a false view of both the Atonement and final judgment. 

In fact, these foundations precede Calvinism and even Calvin and the Reformation. The Reformation doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) was first formulated by St. Anselm in the eleventh century and finalized by Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth. Both were Roman Catholics.1 Nonetheless, since the Calvinist understanding of the final judgment and the Atonement is "incorporated into the majority of the great creeds" and has "formed the doctrinal basis of ... almost all so called 'Evangelical' churches," let's touch on what that understanding is and why I pit the apostles against those doctrines.

Why Target Calvinism

The first reason for targeting Calvinism is the view of the final judgment that has infected almost all Protestant Christianity, but which is thankfully being cured by a healthy dose of the Information Age. Calvinists, along with many who are influenced by Calvinism, believe that God will punish even the smallest sin with eternal torment. Ligonier Ministries, for example, writes:

Of the 47 statements included in The State of Theology study for 2016 ... the responses to one statement stood out. ... The results show slight majorities either getting a belief right or, in most cases, getting a belief wrong. But not statement 17, "Even the smallest sin deserves eternal damnation." ... Glancing at the graph of the data shows this response not to be a simple majority, but rather a whopping majority. 61% strongly disagree. Another 12% disagree somewhat and 7% are not sure. That leaves only 21% agreeing with this statement.2

Personally, I would expect people to be thrilled to find out that people are not accusing God of torturing humans eternally for one small sin. If torturing terrorists during a human lifetime at Guantanamo Bay to prevent further terrorism is potentially immoral, how much more immoral would eternal torture for cheating on a fifth-grade test be!?

Apparently, Ligonier Ministries thinks it is not immoral at all! They write:

Eight out of ten Americans have an incorrect view of sin. As an implication, we could say that eight out of ten Americans do not know the biblical God. (ibid.)

The *biblical* God tortures people for eternity for "THE SMALLEST SIN"??? That would stop me from reading the Bible unless it was to prove the Bible said no such thing!

This is worth targeting. This is worth mounting a war against. Thanks be to God in heaven that a mere 21% of people who took their survey do not believe this slander against God. Thanks be to God that even the group most strongly indfluenced by Calvinism, the evangelicals, reject this slander by a small majority (54%). (ibid.)

The first idea, that God tortures people eternally for the smallest sin, leads to the second: God does not forgive sin without killing a human or animal.


Surely all of us who are in any way spiritually descended from the Reformation will recognize the lyrics of the hymn "Christ Alone" by Allen Asbury:

"Til on that Cross, as Jesus died
The wrath of God was satisfied

 We all believe this, right? We all know that this is obviously true?

Yes. If we are western Christians. If, on the other hand, we are descended from Asian and Middle Eastern churches that have used the Greek language two thousand years, this is a horrifying thought.

Orthodox Archbishop Lazar Puhalo offered this scathing castigation of the concept of Jesus’ atoning sacrifice: “A god who demands the child-sacrifice of his own son to satiate his own wrath? That is not Jehovah. That is Molech.”3

Molech, of course, is one of the Canaanite gods. He demanded that babies be "passed through" the fire in his honor. He is spoken against throughout the Old Testament (e.g., four times in Leviticus 20:1-4).

Obviously, God did sacrifice his Son. That is the central theme of the Bible! It cannot be disputed. So what is this Orthodox archbishop castigating?

The answer is found in the words "to satiate [i.e., satisfy] his own wrath." Let us say someone were to commit a crime that infuriated me, and I was determined to kill the perpetrator. Once I found out it was my wife, whom I loved with all my heart, I knew I could not kill her. So I called my son into the room. I say, "Son, I am so angry that I have to kill someone. The problem is, it was your mom that committed the crime. I don't want to kill her, but I can't just show her mercy because I am holy and just. Would you be willing to let me kill you so that I don't have to kill your mom?"

The son might be the hero of that story, but I would be the villain. It would be useless to tell the court that I could not forgive my wife because I am too holy and just. Well, come to think of it, it might be useful. I might get time in a mental institution rather than a life sentence in prison.

God is not like this. His very nature is to forgive sin. When he revealed himself to Moses, he declared:

The Lord, the Lord God, compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth; who keeps lovingkindness for thousands, who forgives iniquity, transgression and sin; yet He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished, visiting the iniquity of fathers on the children and on the grandchildren to the third and fourth generations. [Ex. 34:6-7, NASB1995; italics in original]

Psalm 136 announces twenty-six times that his lovingkindness is everlasting. Jeremiah's proclamation that the Lord's mercy never ends and is new every morning [Lam. 3:22-23] has been incorporated into many Christian songs and choruses. David cries out in Psalm 51, "Sacrifice and offering you do not desire, or I would have offered it. You do not delight in burnt offerings. The sacrifices of God are a contrite spirit. A broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise" (vv. 16-17)

God can and does forgive sin without killing anyone or anything and always has!

Then why did Jesus die?

Because we were slaves to sin, and he loves us! No one, especially the Lord God Almighty, leaves his children in slavery if he can prevent it.  

God's concern, and the reason for Jesus' death, is that we were slaves to sin. Sin was destroying us. Thus, Jesus died to "redeem us" (Tit. 2:14), "ransom us" (Matt. 20:28), and "free us" (Rom. 6:7) from sin.

I'm going to put this succinctly, and I will have to prove it in other blog posts. From Romans 1:18 through the end of Romans 2, the apostle Paul is arguing that at the final judgment evil people will receive death (esp. 1:32) and righteous people will receive eternal life (esp. 2:6-7). There is no scholarly interpretation needed to conclude this. It is both plainly stated and thoroughly explained.

From Romans 3 through Romans 8, Paul explains how faith in Jesus as the Lord and risen Son of God (Rom. 1:1-5; 10:9-10) can turn a sinner into a righteous man. He is not talking about someone who God pretends is righteous, but someone who actually is righteous. We were slaves to sin, but have become obedient (Rom. 6:17). "Being made free from sin, you became slaves of righteousness (Rom. 6:18).

This is the atonement, and we will be talking about both it and the ways God has equipped us to live righteously throughout these blog posts.


1The word "catholic" means universal. Among the second and third century churches, "catholic" was used to signify the unity of the churches in all the world. The descendants of those churches are no longer united. The churches in the Roman Empire cut off almost all churches east of them along with Syrian and Egyptian churches in the fourth century. In the eleventh century, the churches from Greece to the Middle East and the church in Rome mutually excommunicated each other. Thus, there is no longer a "Catholic Church." I always refer to the Catholic Church headed by the pope as the "Roman" Catholic Church. return to text

2Nichols, S. (2016). The State of Theology: Does Even the Smallest Sin Deserve Eternal Damnation?. Ligonier Ministries. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from Perhaps the most interesting thing about this comment by Ligonier Ministries is that they have since removed this question from their "The State of Theology" web page. return to text

3Erdman, R. 1996. "Sacrifice as Satisfaction, Not Substitution: Atonement in the Summa Theologiae." Anglican Theological Review 96.3. Retrieved May 10, 2021 from return to top 

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to:

Have something to say? Leave a comment below.

Leave a comment   Like   Back to Top   Seen 93 times   Liked 0 times

Subscribe to Updates

If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe to free email updates ?

Subscribe to Blog updates

Enter your email address to be notified of new posts:

Subscribe to:

Alternatively, you can subscribe via RSS RSS

‹ Return to Blog

We never share or sell your email address to anyone.

I've already subscribed / don't show me this again

Recent Posts

Facebook-Trained Pharisees?

| 58 minutes ago | Blogging

Facebook-Trained Pharisees?

I figured out the Pharisee's problem! They got their theological training on Facebook! In John 9, Jesus heals a blind man by spitting on the ground, making clay with the spittle, and rubbing it on the man's eyes. By pharasaic tradition this was working on the Sabbath. Someone sends the now-not-blind man to the Pharisees. Not-Blind Man: I was blind and now I see. Pharisees: How? Not-Blind Man: Who cares how? I can see! Pharisees: We don't believe you. They call for the parents. Parents confirm he was born blind. Pharisees: Well, okay, I guess you're not lying. Stay away from the guy who healed you, he doesn't agree with our Bible interpretation. If you do see him, call him "sinner." Not-Blind Man: You do realize this is the first man in the history of the world to heal a man born blind, right? Pharisees: Have any of us believed in him? Then, obviously, you shouldn't, either. Not-Blind Man: It seems like if your tradition about these tiny Sabbath works were true, this guy wouldn't be able to HEAL BLIND EYES!! Pharisees: Are you trying to teach us? We're smart; you're stupid! You're a sinner, too!. SINNER ... SINNER ... SINNER! Get out of here! Social media, alive and well in the first century! var refTagger = { settings: { bibleVersion: 'NKJV' } }; (function(d, t) { var n=d.querySelector('[nonce]'); refTagger.settings.nonce = n && (n.nonce||n.getAttribute('nonce')); var g = d.createElement(t), s = d.getElementsByTagName(t)[0]; g.src = ''; g.nonce = refTagger.settings.nonce; s.parentNode.insertBefore(g, s); }(document, 'script'));...

An Explosive View of the Atonement: Ransom and Aphesis

| 20th September 2021 | Blogging

Aphesis: release; by implication, forgiveness This word is not extraordinary if you look it up in a lexicon, but it will blow your mind, capture your heart, and set you free if you look it up in the Bible. I weep that translators have chosen to translate aphesis as "forgiveness" so often. It is so much more than that. Aphesis is the Greek word for Jubilee. Every 50 years, the land in Israel was to return to the families who owned it all the way back to the time of Joshua. The land was never to change hands except temporarily. Jubilee came with a trumpet blast, and all land that had been leased out was returned to the original families. Jubilee came after 7 sets of 7 years. The 50th year was Jubilee, but it was tied to the sets of 7 years. Every 7 years, all Hebrew servants were set free and all debts were forgiven. The Greek word for this 7-year release? Aphesis. Every year, on the Day of Atonement, two goats were brought before the temple and the high priest. One was sacrificed. The second, called the goat of aphesis, the scapegoat, was released into the wilderness after the priest had laid hands on its head and confessed the sins of Israel. Aphesis is all these things, so at the end of the very first Christian preaching, on the day of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit came upon Peter, he did not tell them to be baptized so their sins could be "forgiven." He told them they could be baptized for the APHESIS of their sins. Their ancestral rights would be restored (JUBILEE); their debts would be forgiven, and they would be freed from sin's slavery (7-YEAR RELEASE), and their sins would be sent far from them (SCAPEGOAT). In Ephesians 1:7 and Colossians 1:14, we read that we have received "redemption," the "forgiveness" of sins. This is like reading about a firecracker while Paul actually tossed a hand-grenade. 1 Corinthians 6:20 says we were BOUGHT WITH A PRICE. We were BOUGHT. We say Jesus "paid the penalty," and we think it is so our sins could be forgiven. When we think that way, we have no problem saying, "Thank you, Jesus. See you down the road when its judgment time, and I can collect my eternal life and any other rewards you care to bestow on me." Ha, ha. Ransom Jesus paid a price, and that price was to buy you and to buy me, to BUY us. Ephesians 1:7 actually says that we have RELEASE BY RANSOM, the APHESIS of sins, by his blood (; click on that little "629" above "release by ransom" when you get to the link so you can see the various ways lexicons define that Greek word, all including "ransom"). Ephesians 1:7 is a huge verse, a grenade and not a firecracker. It BLOWS UP everything you ever knew!! Jesus BOUGHT you by being a RANSOM, a ransom who was KILLED and whose BLOOD was the price of your release from SLAVERY to sin. The reason that there was a 50-year Jubilee is because Israelites got themselves in trouble, in debt, in poverty, and they had to lease their ancestral land in order to be rescued from their trouble, debt, or poverty. Every 50 years, they got a complete do-over, a re-start. Every 7 years, they got a boost, a release of debts, but they had to wait 50 years for full restoration to their rights as a descendant of Israel. Jesus gave us all of this and so much more because he is not giving us earthly land that can be taken away, nor the rights as a son of fleshly Israel. When he BOUGHT us with his blood and suffering, he gave us ETERNAL land, ETERNAL rights. We did not receive the favor (grace) of man or of an earthly king. He bought us the FAVOR OF THE KING OF THE UNIVERSE. We are BOUGHT with a great price, a RANSOM, and we receive APHESIS, a reward so great we cannot really comprehend it, and now ... we are now BONDSERVANTS of the living God. Thus Peter writes ... ***WARNING: If you read what Peter said, it may shake you to your core.*** If you call on the Father, who impartially judges according to each man's work, then conduct yourself throughout the time of your journey here w...

2 Chronicles 7:14 and the Healing of God's Kingdom: A Lamentation

| 27th August 2021 | Blogging

"My eyes are dry ... my prayers are cold." These are words from a song by Keith Green. We have good reason to repent of this and to fill our eyes with tears and our prayers with fervor. Almost no one is telling us why. This is new to me, too. For those of you that love the Lord, please weep with me and with Jeremiah. In Lamentations, Jeremiah is lamenting over the fall of Judah. Babylon had destroyed Jerusalem, taken all the gold, silver, and bronze, then destroyed and burned the temple and the city. "The adversary has stretched out his hand over all her precious things, for she has seen the nations enter her sanctuary, the ones you commanded that they should not enter into your congregations." (Lam. 1:10, NASB) I am convinced that one of the greatest problems in modern churches is that they are a mix of committed Christians and people who simply attend church. In most cases those who merely attend greatly outnumber the ones who are "not lagging in spirit, fervent in zeal, serving the Lord" (Rom. 12:11). It is a rare church that obeys Paul's command not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers "because what fellowship does righteousness have with unrighteousness" (2 Cor. 6:14). Instead, we open our doors to anyone who wants to come so that there is NEVER a meeting for disciples only who can exhort one another and provoke to good works (Heb. 10:24-25). (It is great to have meetings that reach the lost, but not at the expense of having no meetings for obedient Christians only.) The result is that: "All her people groan seeking bread; they have given their precious things for food." (Lam. 1:11, NASB) As a blogger and writer of books on church history and discipleship, I can tell you that there are many, many, many people out there groaning, seeking bread, feeling like the weekly sermons are pablum, irrelevant, or shallow. They have no idea how to find and gather with others who are "not lagging in spirit, fervent in zeal, serving the Lord" (Rom. 12:11). "My eyes fail because of tears. My spirit is greatly troubled; my heart is poured out on the earth because of the destruction of the daughter of my people, when little ones and infants faint in the streets of the city." (Lam. 2:11, NASB) We live by "every word that is proceeding from the mouth of God" (Matt. 4:4). This is our "daily bread" (Matt. 6:11). Yet, as said above, many—very many—of our Father's little children languish for lack of the bread we should be feeding one another. Little ones and infants faint in the streets because they get so little of the needed milk of the word (1 Pet. 2:2). The majority of converts in American churches fall away quickly, some within weeks, some within a few short years, yet our eyes are not full of tears. Our spirits are not greatly troubled like Jeremiah's was. Our heart is not poured out on the earth because we do not see the destruction of God's people that has been going on for centuries. A Call to Prayer and Repentance God has said, "If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land" (2 Chr. 7:14). Typically, we think about our earthly country when we read that passage, but when that verse was written, it was about God's earthly kingdom, Israel and Judah. We are primarily citizens of heaven, not the US, the UK, Australia, Singapore, nor any other earthly country. As I hope you have picked up above, we need weeping eyes, humility, and fervent prayers for the kingdom from heaven of which we are a part. Here in the United States, we Christians have patterned a Christianity mostly devoid of diligence and fervency of spirit. Since those things are commanded in Romans 12:11, we have patterned a disobedient, negligent Christianity in which Christians publicly announce that they would never turn the other cheek as Jesus commanded. We should be weeping more than Jeremiah bec...

1 John 2:19: "They Were Never of Us"

| 26th August 2021 | Blogging

A Once-Saved, Always Saved, Eternal Security Question A friend asked me: "If there is an initial justification; if upon receiving Jesus we have passed from death to life, is the final justification receiving what has been ours all along? Or is it something that can be lost or forfeited, so a person was justified in God's sight on one day, but because of sin later, they are going to be condemned on the final judgment day? If that is so, When did God uncancel the debt and take it from the cross? (Colossians 2:14) . Also if the first justification can be lost or forfeited, why does John have no doubt that those who went out from us were NEVER of us? (1 John 2:19). Fighting for Honesty and Formulating My Response My wife likes to tell me that the spiritual gift I should practice and emphasize in my life and writing is the ability to deal honestly with what Scripture says. I can tell you from experience that dealing honestly with Scripture, setting aside tradition and what you are sure you know, is a furiously difficult thing to do. When discoveries are made, the work seems well worth it. At other times, especially when I find out I have seriously misunderstood a Scripture or a subject and have to tell some jerk that he was right, being honest with Scripture is extremely painful. My answer to my friend was more of the joyous discovery kind of feeling. My general process is to examine the Scriptures referenced in the questions openly and honestly while, initially, ignoring the argument in the questions or any feelings I may have about the person asking the questions. I just look at the verses, do my best to understand and accept what they plainly say, and only then do I consider the questions and the arguments implicit in the questions. This produced really pleasant results today, at least in my mind. My response settled and finalized some things I have already been considering because of how unique the apostle John's writings are. My Response In reference to Col 2:14, the NASB and NIV agree with you that the "handwriting of ordinances" is debt, but Meyer's NT commentary says they are wrong, "What is thus characterized is NOT the burden of debt lying upon man, which is, as it were, his debt-schedule (Bleek), but the Mosaic law." Nonetheless, even if it were debt, Jesus addresses this directly in a parable. I'm sure you know it. The servant's debt was forgiven, but then it was reinstated when he would not forgive a fellow servant a much smaller sum (Matt. 18:23-35). Then you asked, "Is final justification the receiving of what was ours all along?" According to John, yes. According to all the other NT writers, no. John is the only NT writer who speaks of eternal life as a present possession (e.g., John 6:47). For Paul, it is a future reward (Rom. 2:6-7; Gal. 6:7-9; Rom. 6:22-23, etc.). John has a unique focus on the present, much more so than the rest of the New Testament. Thus, in John's Gospel and letters, whatever is true now is true always. Thus, 1 John 2:19 and "they were never of us" is typical of his writing, not exceptional. In the specific case of 1 John 2:19, the Gospels seem to concur. Jesus "never knew" those who did mighty works in his name but lived in iniquity (Matt. 7:23). The bridegroom did not know the five virgins whose oil ran out even though they were expecting to be married to him (Matt. 25:1-13). That's a difficult thought to explain, but if we just accept the teaching at face value, without explanation—as I always prefer to do—we must say that those who receive the Holy Spirit (the oil of the virgins), if they fall away, are regarded as never known. That is no contradiction to Paul's repeated statements that eternal life will only be rewarded to those who have holiness because of living righteously (Rom. 6:22) and to those who have not grown weary in doing good works by sowing to the Spirit (Rom. 2:6-7; Gal. 6:8-9; Rom. 8:12-13). It seems obvious to me that in response to the things we have j...